Poco M6 Pro 5G vs Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G
A spec-by-spec comparison of the Poco M6 Pro 5G and the Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G, taken from their full specification sheets. Green marks the better value in each measured row.
Head to head
| Poco M6 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G |
| Our rating | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Battery | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 18W | 25W |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Screen size | 6.79 in | 6.7 in |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Weight (lower is lighter) | 199 g | — |
| Released | Aug 2023 | Mar 2026 |
Summary: Poco M6 Pro 5G is ahead on ram (max), storage (max), screen size. Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G is ahead on battery, wired charging, refresh rate.
Display
| Poco M6 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 550 nits (peak) | PLS LCD, 120Hz, 650 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM) |
| Size | 6.79 inches | 6.7 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi) | 720 x 1600 pixels (HD+) |
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | — |
| Aspect Ratio | — | 20:9 |
Platform
| Poco M6 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G |
| OS | Android 13, MIUI 14 | Android 16, One UI 8 |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 |
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Unspecified |
Memory
| Poco M6 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G |
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (hybrid slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM (UFS 2.2) | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Storage Type | — | UFS 2.2 |
Main Camera
| Poco M6 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G |
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF; 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | — |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Modules | — | 50 MP, (wide), PDAF |
Selfie Camera
| Poco M6 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | — |
| Features | HDR | Unspecified |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Modules | — | 8 MP |
Battery
| Poco M6 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 6000 mAh, non-removable |
| Charging | 18W wired, Power Delivery | 25W wired |
Body
| Poco M6 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G |
| Dimensions | 168.6 x 76.3 x 8.2 mm | 167.4 x 77.4 x 8.2 mm (6.59 x 3.05 x 0.32 in) |
| Weight | 199 g | Unspecified |
| Build | Glass front (Corning Gorilla Glass), plastic frame, glass back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| IP Rating | IP53, dust and splash resistant | — |
| Protection | — | Rated for dust and splashes |
Comms
| Poco M6 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| NFC | — | Unspecified |
| Radio | — | Unspecified |
Launch
| Poco M6 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G |
| Announced | 2023, August 05 | 2026, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, August 05 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Which has the better battery, Poco M6 Pro 5G or Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G?
Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G — 5,000 mAh for the Poco M6 Pro 5G versus 6,000 mAh for the Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G.
Which has more RAM, Poco M6 Pro 5G or Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G?
Poco M6 Pro 5G — 8 GB for the Poco M6 Pro 5G versus 6 GB for the Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G.
Which has the smoother screen, Poco M6 Pro 5G or Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G?
Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G — 90 Hz for the Poco M6 Pro 5G versus 120 Hz for the Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G.
Which is newer, Poco M6 Pro 5G or Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G?
Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G — Aug 2023 for the Poco M6 Pro 5G versus Mar 2026 for the Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G.
Is the Poco M6 Pro 5G or the Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G rated higher?
We rate the Poco M6 Pro 5G 7/10 and the Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G 7/10.
Best phone lists →