LG K10+ (2018) vs Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018)
A spec-by-spec comparison of the LG K10+ (2018) and the Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), taken from their full specification sheets. Green marks the better value in each measured row.
Head to head
| LG K10+ (2018) | Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018) |
| Our rating | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Battery | 3,000 mAh | 3,300 mAh |
| RAM (max) | — | 2 GB |
| Storage (max) | 32 GB | 512 GB |
| Screen size | 5.3 in | 5.5 in |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Weight (lower is lighter) | 162 g | 181 g |
| Released | Apr 2018 | Jul 2018 |
Summary: LG K10+ (2018) is ahead on weight (lower is lighter). Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018) is ahead on battery, storage (max), screen size.
★ Which should you buy? Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018) is the stronger overall pick on the measured specs.
Reviewed by the infozme.com Editorial Team — see how we research & rate phones.
Display
| LG K10+ (2018) | Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018) |
| Type | IPS LCD capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors | TFT LCD |
| Size | 5.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| Resolution | 720 x 1280 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) |
| Protection | 2.5D Curved Glass, Scratch Resistant | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Pixel Density | ~277 ppi | — |
Platform
| LG K10+ (2018) | Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018) |
| OS | Android 7.1.2 (Nougat) | Android 8.0 Oreo, upgradable to Android 9.0 Pie with One UI |
| Chipset | MediaTek MT6750 | Exynos 7870 Octa (14 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core (4x 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x 1.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core 1.6 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| GPU | ARM Mali-T860 MP2 @520 MHz | Mali-T830 MP1 |
Memory
| LG K10+ (2018) | Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018) |
| RAM | 3GB LPDDR3 | — |
| Internal Storage | 32GB (eMMC) | — |
| Card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC up to 2TB | microSDXC (dedicated slot), expandable up to 256GB or 512GB |
| Internal | — | 16GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 2GB RAM |
Main Camera
| LG K10+ (2018) | Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018) |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, AF | 13 MP, f/1.9 (wide), AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
Selfie Camera
| LG K10+ (2018) | Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018) |
| Single | 5 MP or 8 MP | 13 MP, f/1.9 (wide) or 5 MP (operator-dependent) |
| Features | Flash for Selfie, Gesture Shot, Auto Shot | LED flash (on some variants) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
Battery
| LG K10+ (2018) | Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018) |
| Type | Non-removable Li-Ion | Li-Ion 3300 mAh, non-removable |
| Capacity | 3000 mAh | — |
| Charging | Standard charging | Standard charging |
Body
| LG K10+ (2018) | Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018) |
| Dimensions | 148.7 x 75.3 x 8.68 mm | 153.2 x 76.2 x 8.6 mm (6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 in) |
| Weight | 162 g | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| SIM | Single SIM or Dual SIM | Single SIM (Nano-SIM) or Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Build | — | Plastic back and frame, Corning Gorilla Glass 5 front |
Comms
| LG K10+ (2018) | Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018) |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS | — |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (operator-dependent) |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, USB On-The-Go | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| Positioning | — | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | — | FM radio |
Launch
| LG K10+ (2018) | Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018) |
| Announced | February 2018 | June 2018 |
| Status | Released April 2018 | Available. Released July 2018 |
Frequently asked questions
Which has the better battery, LG K10+ (2018) or Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018)?
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018) — 3,000 mAh for the LG K10+ (2018) versus 3,300 mAh for the Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018).
Which is lighter, LG K10+ (2018) or Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018)?
LG K10+ (2018) — 162 g for the LG K10+ (2018) versus 181 g for the Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018).
Which is newer, LG K10+ (2018) or Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018)?
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018) — Apr 2018 for the LG K10+ (2018) versus Jul 2018 for the Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018).
Is the LG K10+ (2018) or the Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018) rated higher?
We rate the LG K10+ (2018) 6/10 and the Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018) 6/10.
Best phone lists →