HTC 8XT vs Samsung Ativ S Neo
A spec-by-spec comparison of the HTC 8XT and the Samsung Ativ S Neo, taken from their full specification sheets. Green marks the better value in each measured row.
Head to head
| HTC 8XT | Samsung Ativ S Neo |
| Our rating | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Battery | 1,800 mAh | 2,000 mAh |
| RAM (max) | — | 1 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Screen size | 4.3 in | 4.8 in |
| Main camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Weight (lower is lighter) | 120 g | 144 g |
| Released | Jul 2013 | Aug 2013 |
Summary: HTC 8XT is ahead on weight (lower is lighter). Samsung Ativ S Neo is ahead on battery, screen size.
★ Which should you buy? Samsung Ativ S Neo is the stronger overall pick on the measured specs.
Reviewed by the infozme.com Editorial Team — see how we research & rate phones.
Display
| HTC 8XT | Samsung Ativ S Neo |
| Type | Super LCD capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors | TFT LCD [1, 6, 7] |
| Size | 4.3 inches | 4.8 inches [3, 6, 14] |
| Resolution | 480 x 800 pixels (WVGA) | 720 x 1280 pixels [2, 3, 6] |
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 2 | Not specified |
| Pixel Density | ~217 ppi | 306 ppi [7, 32] |
Platform
| HTC 8XT | Samsung Ativ S Neo |
| OS | Microsoft Windows Phone 8 | Microsoft Windows Phone 8 [1, 2, 3] |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8230 Snapdragon 400 | Qualcomm MSM8930AA Snapdragon 400 [3, 10, 21] |
| CPU | Dual-core 1.4 GHz Krait | Dual-core 1.4 GHz Krait 300 [1, 3, 5] |
| GPU | Adreno 305 | Adreno 305 [3] |
Memory
| HTC 8XT | Samsung Ativ S Neo |
| Internal | 8GB | 16GB 1GB RAM [2, 3, 7] |
| RAM | 1GB | — |
| Card slot | microSDXC, up to 64GB | microSDXC, up to 64 GB [3, 7] |
Main Camera
| HTC 8XT | Samsung Ativ S Neo |
| Single | 8 MP, autofocus, LED flash | 8 MP [2, 5, 7] |
| Features | BSI sensor, f/2.0 aperture | LED flash, geo-tagging [6, 7] |
| Video | 1080p | 1080p@30fps [16], 640x480, 1280x720, 1920x1080 options [29] |
Selfie Camera
| HTC 8XT | Samsung Ativ S Neo |
| Single | 1.6 MP | 1.9 MP [7, 8] |
| Features | f/2.2 lens | — |
| Video | — | Not specified |
Battery
| HTC 8XT | Samsung Ativ S Neo |
| Type | Li-Ion 1800 mAh, non-removable | Removable Li-Ion 2000 mAh [1, 2, 3] |
| Talk time | — | Up to 15 h (3G) [5] |
Body
| HTC 8XT | Samsung Ativ S Neo |
| Dimensions | 132.1 x 66 x 9.9 mm (5.2 x 2.6 x 0.39 inches) | 135.4 x 69.1 x 9.1 mm (5.33 x 2.72 x 0.36 in) [6, 7] |
| Weight | 120 g (4.23 oz) | 144 g (5.08 oz) [2, 6, 7] |
| Build | Plastic body with soft-touch finish | Glossy polycarbonate with chrome accents [31] |
| SIM | Micro-SIM | Micro-SIM |
Comms
| HTC 8XT | Samsung Ativ S Neo |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band [5, 6] |
| Bluetooth | 3.0 | 4.0, A2DP, LE [21] |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS | — |
| NFC | Yes | Yes [6, 8] |
| Radio | No | Not specified |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 [7] |
| Positioning | — | GPS, GLONASS |
Launch
| HTC 8XT | Samsung Ativ S Neo |
| Announced | June 2013 | 2013, June 26 [1] |
| Status | Discontinued | Released 2013, August [2, 3] |
| Release Date | July 19, 2013 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Which has the better battery, HTC 8XT or Samsung Ativ S Neo?
Samsung Ativ S Neo — 1,800 mAh for the HTC 8XT versus 2,000 mAh for the Samsung Ativ S Neo.
Which is lighter, HTC 8XT or Samsung Ativ S Neo?
HTC 8XT — 120 g for the HTC 8XT versus 144 g for the Samsung Ativ S Neo.
Which is newer, HTC 8XT or Samsung Ativ S Neo?
Samsung Ativ S Neo — Jul 2013 for the HTC 8XT versus Aug 2013 for the Samsung Ativ S Neo.
Is the HTC 8XT or the Samsung Ativ S Neo rated higher?
We rate the HTC 8XT 6/10 and the Samsung Ativ S Neo 6/10.
Best phone lists →