BlackBerry Curve 9320 vs Nokia Asha 302
A spec-by-spec comparison of the BlackBerry Curve 9320 and the Nokia Asha 302, taken from their full specification sheets. Green marks the better value in each measured row.
Head to head
| BlackBerry Curve 9320 | Nokia Asha 302 |
|---|
| Price | $45 | $38 |
| Our rating | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Battery | 1,450 mAh | 1,430 mAh |
| Storage (max) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Screen size | 2.44 in | 2.4 in |
| Main camera | 15 MP | 3.2 MP |
| Weight (lower is lighter) | 103 g | 99 g |
| Released | May 2012 | Mar 2012 |
Summary: BlackBerry Curve 9320 is ahead on battery, screen size, main camera. Nokia Asha 302 is ahead on weight (lower is lighter).
★ Which should you buy? BlackBerry Curve 9320 is the stronger overall pick on the measured specs. If budget matters more than the extra capability, Nokia Asha 302 is the cheaper option.
Reviewed by the infozme.com Editorial Team — see how we research & rate phones.
Display
| BlackBerry Curve 9320 | Nokia Asha 302 |
|---|
| Type | TFT | TFT, 256K colors |
| Colors | 65K colors | — |
| Size | 2.44 inches, 18.4 cm2 (~28.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 2.4 inches |
| Resolution | 320 x 240 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~164 ppi density) | 320 x 240 pixels |
| Pixel Density | — | 167 ppi |
Platform
| BlackBerry Curve 9320 | Nokia Asha 302 |
|---|
| OS | BlackBerry OS 7.1 | Nokia Series 40 Asha |
| CPU | 806 MHz single-core processor | 1.0 GHz ARM11 |
Memory
| BlackBerry Curve 9320 | Nokia Asha 302 |
|---|
| Internal | 512MB RAM, 512MB ROM | 256MB ROM, 128MB RAM (approx. 100MB user available) |
| Card slot | microSDHC, up to 32GB (dedicated slot) | microSDHC, up to 32 GB |
Main Camera
| BlackBerry Curve 9320 | Nokia Asha 302 |
|---|
| Single | 3.15 MP (or 3.2 MP), 2048x1536 pixels | 3.2 MP |
| Features | LED flash, Geo-tagging, Image Stabilization | Fixed-focus, EDoF (Extended Depth of Field) |
| Video | Yes | VGA@15fps (640x480) |
Selfie Camera
| BlackBerry Curve 9320 | Nokia Asha 302 |
|---|
| Single | No | No |
Battery
| BlackBerry Curve 9320 | Nokia Asha 302 |
|---|
| Type | Removable Li-Ion 1450 mAh battery | Removable Li-Ion 1430 mAh (BL-5J) |
| Stand-by | Up to 432 h (2G) / Up to 432 h (3G) | — |
| Talk time | Up to 7 h (2G) / Up to 7 h (3G) | — |
Body
| BlackBerry Curve 9320 | Nokia Asha 302 |
|---|
| Dimensions | 109 x 60 x 12.7 mm (4.29 x 2.36 x 0.5 in) | 115.2 x 58.9 x 13.5 mm |
| Weight | 103 g (3.63 oz) | 99 g |
| Keyboard | QWERTY | QWERTY |
| SIM | Mini-SIM | Single SIM (Regular-SIM) |
| Navigation | Optical trackpad | — |
Comms
| BlackBerry Curve 9320 | Nokia Asha 302 |
|---|
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Bluetooth | 2.1, A2DP | 2.1, A2DP, EDR |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS | No dedicated GPS |
| NFC | No | — |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0, USB On-The-Go (OTG) |
| Radio | — | Stereo FM radio with RDS |
Launch
| BlackBerry Curve 9320 | Nokia Asha 302 |
|---|
| Announced | May 2012 | February 2012 |
| Status | Released May 2012 | Released March 2012 |
Frequently asked questions
Which has the better battery, BlackBerry Curve 9320 or Nokia Asha 302?
BlackBerry Curve 9320 — 1,450 mAh for the BlackBerry Curve 9320 versus 1,430 mAh for the Nokia Asha 302.
Which is lighter, BlackBerry Curve 9320 or Nokia Asha 302?
Nokia Asha 302 — 103 g for the BlackBerry Curve 9320 versus 99 g for the Nokia Asha 302.
Which is newer, BlackBerry Curve 9320 or Nokia Asha 302?
BlackBerry Curve 9320 — May 2012 for the BlackBerry Curve 9320 versus Mar 2012 for the Nokia Asha 302.
Is the BlackBerry Curve 9320 or the Nokia Asha 302 rated higher?
We rate the BlackBerry Curve 9320 6/10 and the Nokia Asha 302 6/10.
Best phone lists →
